The Xero Blog

One foot with shoe, one bare foot

Are Barefoot Shoes Good for Flat Feet or High Arches?

Have you ever thought: “I wish I could wear barefoot shoes, but I can’t. I need support.” Maybe you’ve wanted to try barefoot shoes, but you have flat feet or high arches and you’re worried they won’t give you enough support. It’s great that you’re thinking about how barefoot shoes would affect your overall foot health.   You may have been told that your feet need shoes to support, cushion and control your movement. But here’s another way to look at it: your feet are meant to move. Xero Shoes are built around natural movement: a roomy, foot-shaped toe box, zero-drop sole, flexible low-to-the-ground feel, and lightweight construction. The goal is not to “fix” feet overnight, but to let them bend, flex, and function more like feet. What Are Foot Arches? If you look carefully at a foot, you’ll see it has arch shapes running in more than one direction: front to back and side to side. When people talk about “flat feet” or “high arches,” they’re usually talking about the arch that runs lengthwise along the inside of your foot. This arch is not a rigid bridge. It’s flexible. It changes shape as you stand, walk, run, jump, lift, and move through life. Some people have lower arches. Some people have higher arches.  There’s no single “perfect” foot shape. There’s your foot, your movement, and what feels comfortable and natural for you. Flat Feet vs High Arches Flat feet generally means the inside arch of the foot sits lower to the ground. High arches generally means the inside arch sits higher and leaves less of the midfoot touching the ground. Plenty of people have lower or higher arches and never even notice.  Here’s a simple way to find out: Go outside to your driveway or another dry concrete surface. Wet your feet, then stand on the concrete for a few seconds. When you step away, you’ll see your footprint. Take a picture quickly before it disappears. A fuller footprint may suggest lower arches. A footprint with only a narrow strip connecting the heel and forefoot may suggest higher arches. This is not a diagnosis, but it can be a fun way to notice your foot shape. How Barefoot Shoes Works for Different Arch Types Traditional footwear is built around the idea that feet need support to function well. But that’s not the only way to think about shoes.  Flat feet and high arches are different, but both can be affected by traditional shoes that have a narrow toe box to restrict toe space, lift the heel, or have a stiff, cushioned sole that limits foot motion.  Barefoot shoes are designed to reduce those restrictions. Instead of adding structure that limits motion, it gives your foot more room and freedom inside the shoe. Xero Shoes are designed to reduce those restrictions with: A roomy, foot-shaped toe box so your toes have space to spread A zero-drop sole, meaning your heel and forefoot sit at the same height A flexible sole that lets your foot bend and move A low-to-the-ground feel so you can stay connected to the surface beneath you Lightweight construction that doesn’t make your feet feel boxed in Are Barefoot Shoes Better for Flat Feet or High Arches? Neither arch type is automatically “better” for barefoot shoes. The better question is whether the shoe allows comfortable, natural movement for your foot.  People with flat feet may find a flexible, zero-drop shoe may encourage the foot and lower leg to activate as you walk, train or move through your day. The low-to-the-ground feel can help feel more engaged and connected to the ground. Research suggests that foot strengthening can correct flat feet. If you have high arches, you may appreciate a shoe that does not squeeze your toes or force your foot into a narrow shape. A roomy toe box gives your toes space to spread, while a flexible sole allows your foot to bend and adjust as you move. The big shift is mindset. Instead of asking, “How much support can this shoe give me?” you might ask, “Does this shoe let my foot move comfortably?” For many Xero Shoes fans, that question changes everything. Our design philosophy is simple: let your feet move, bend, flex, and feel.  Key Takeaways Barefoot footwear may be comfortable for some people with flat feet or high arches, but results vary by individual. Look for a roomy toe box, zero-drop sole, flexibility, low-to-the-ground feel, and activity-appropriate traction. Transition gradually to give your feet, calves, and movement patterns time to adapt. Choose barefoot running shoes, hiking shoes, sandals, boots, or training shoes based on the surfaces and conditions you use most. Consult a qualified professional if you have pain, injury history, or medical foot concerns. Frequently Asked Questions Are barefoot shoes good for flat feet? Barefoot shoes may work well for some people with flat feet because they allow more natural foot motion and give the toes room to spread. The best approach is to start gradually and choose a shoe that feels comfortable for your foot and activity. Are barefoot shoes good for high arches? Some people with high arches like barefoot-inspired shoes because they are flexible, lightweight, and roomy in the toe box. A good fit matters most, especially if you are used to narrow or highly structured shoes. Should barefoot shoes have arch support? Traditional arch support is not the focus of barefoot-style design. The idea is to let the foot move and engage naturally, though some people may still need professional guidance or temporary support. What About Orthotics? Some people may want to start wearing orthotics with their barefoot shoes. Pairing orthotics with a flat, zero-drop shoe may work well because it’s a simpler base for the insert. Make sure the fit feels comfortable, your toes still have room, and the orthotic sits properly inside the shoe. If your orthotics were recommended by a professional, check with them before making a big footwear change. Conclusion Barefoot shoes can work for people with flat feet or high arches who want shoes that allow more natural movement. The best results usually come from choosing the right fit, matching the shoe to the activity, and transitioning patiently. Ready to try your own pair of barefoot shoes? Take this quiz to find your perfect pair here. The content of this post is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions or concerns you may have about your health or a medical condition.  This blog was updated on June 26, 2026.  
Read More Are Barefoot Shoes Good for Flat Feet or High Arches?
Hikers wearing Xero Shoes barefoot hiking footwear

Hiking Boots vs. Hiking Shoes: How to Choose the Right Trail Footwear

When you hit the trail, one question comes up again and again: do you lace up hiking boots or hiking shoes? The honest answer is that there’s no single right pick for everyone, but there is a right pick for you, your feet, and the trails you love. At Xero Shoes, we look at this a little differently than most. We believe footwear should protect your feet while letting them function the way they were meant to: bend, flex, feel, and move.  So whether you land on a hiking boot or a hiking shoe, the goal is the same: natural movement, a wide toe box for your toes to splay, and a zero-drop sole that lets you actually feel the ground beneath you. To help break down the differences, we spoke with Michael Pao, Chief Product Officer at Xero Shoes, about what hikers should consider before getting a pair and hitting the trails. Do You Need a Pair of Both? Maybe! It really does come down to personal preference and the kind of hiking you do. If you hike year-round in a range of conditions and encounter cold wet weather, rocky terrain, short day hikes and fast, dusty summer miles, you can benefit from having both a barefoot hiking boot and a lighter trail shoe in your gear closet.  If most of your hikes’ terrain and weather are similar, one well-chosen pair will carry you a long way. The Fundamentals: Core Differences Between Hiking Boots and Hiking Shoes Michael’s Expert Tip: “The biggest difference is protection,” says Michael. “With Xero Shoes hiking styles, the outsole and materials may be similar between a low shoe and a mid boot, but the boot adds more coverage around the ankle and collar.” Hiking Boots Boots rise above the ankle. That extra collar height adds more protection around your ankles from rocks and brush, and more ankle support on loose, uneven terrain. But it can also mean more weight and slightly less ankle mobility. Our waterproof barefoot boots add that coverage, plus a waterproof option, that still provide flexibility and a zero-drop design that lets your feet move naturally. Hiking Shoes A hiking shoe’s collar sits below the ankle, giving your ankle a full range of mobility.  You trade the ankle collar for more natural foot movement from ankle-down. For a lot of hikers, that freedom is the whole point, your feet and ankles get to do their job, getting stronger mile after mile. Materials, Construction & Outsole Both styles start with the same barefoot DNA: a foot-shaped design that’s wide and roomy in the toe box to support natural toe splay,  yet fitted to the midfoot and heel to feel secure. A thin and flexible outsole gives a balance of ground feedback and protection and grippy lugs provide traction. From there: Uppers range from non-waterproof fast-draining, breathable mesh (great for heat and water crossings) to a sealed waterproof membrane (great for rain, mud, and cold temperatures). Outsoles are fine-tuned for trail terrain. Our Scrambler Low EV trail runner uses a Michelin® FiberLite outsole (yes, the same brand as the tire company) that keeps the shoe flexible and lightweight with a trail-ready grip Construction details like a waterproof membrane and gusseted tongue (more on that below) decide how much water and debris stay out. Midfoot lockdown:  Xero Shoes’ huarache-inspired tensioning system helps hold the midfoot in place while leaving room in the toe box and forefoot for natural foot movement. Height & Weight Hiking boots come in mid and high cuts, but Xero Shoes focuses more on mid-cuts. More coverage means more materials which means the boots weigh a little more. Low-cut hiking shoes are lighter. The good news: because every pair is built minimalist-first, even our boots stay light and flexible compared to conventional hikers. Michael’s Expert Tip: When choosing between a hiking boot and hiking shoe, Michael says the biggest trade-off is usually weight. A boot has more material, more padding, and a longer tongue, which can add protection, but also adds weight and slightly reduces ankle flexion compared to a low hiking shoe. Xero Shoes’ Scrambler Trail collection has the same materials, waterproofing and outsole construction between the Scrambler Trail Mid WP boot and Scrambler Trail Low WP shoe. The main difference is simply the boot versus shoe.  The Engineering Trade-Off: How Collar Height Affects Performance Here’s the heart of the boots-vs-shoes question. A higher collar adds coverage and support because it shields your ankle from trail debris and keeps more dirt out. The added security and lace hooks on the boot can also give the heel and rear foot a more locked-in feel. A lower collar adds mobility so your ankle moves freely and your foot reacts to the terrain in real time. Neither is “support” in the old-school sense. At Xero Shoes, the real support comes from your feet getting stronger. Here’s how the two stack up: Feature Hiking Boots Hiking Shoes Ankle coverage Above the ankle, more protection from rocks, brush, and rollovers At or below the ankle, full, natural ankle movement Protection More coverage against debris, mud, and trail hazards Lighter coverage; ideal for cleaner trails Weight A bit heavier (membrane + materials) Lighter and more flexible upper Weather range Waterproof for wet and cold conditions Breathable and fast-drying for heat and water crossings Best for Rugged, wet, cold, or overgrown terrain; heavier packs; long mileage Maintained trails, fast day hikes, hot weather, lighter loads Can You Use Trail Running Shoes as Your Hiking Shoes? Absolutely, and our Scrambler Low EV (women’s here) is a perfect fit for anyone who wants one shoe that runs and hikes, or if you prefer a light and agile feel. This lightweight trail runner has an abrasion- and debris-resistant mesh upper, a Michelin® FiberLite outsole, and a barefoot feel that’s right at home on a day hike. A men’s size 9 weighs just 9.2 oz (260.8 g) per shoe, women’s size 7 weighs 7.4oz (210g) per shoe. Prefer something built for the trail but still featherweight? The non-waterproof Mesa Trail II (women’s) is another great crossover and one of our lightest.  Here’s how trail running shoes compare to boots on the details that matter most: Weight: Trail runners are designed with less material around the ankle and are generally lighter. Durability: Boots are a good pick for bushwhacking and rocky terrain, but a rugged trail runner like the Scrambler Low EV handles regular trail abuse with ease.  Breathability: Mesh trail runners breathe and drain far better than a sealed waterproof boot, so your feet stay cooler and dry faster. Choosing Between Hiking Boots and Hiking Shoes The types of hikes you like, and your personal preference, ultimately decide whether you need both shoes and boots in your closet, or just one trusty pair. Run through these five factors and the answer usually gets obvious. Terrain Well-maintained, smooth trails: Hiking shoes give you plenty of protection with more agility. Rugged, rocky, or uneven terrain: Boots add ankle coverage and stability on the chaos underfoot. Overgrown paths or bushwhacking: Boots protect against brush, rocks, and debris far better. Weather Conditions Condition Better Option Why Wet / rainy Waterproof boots Keep water out longer and pair well with gaiters Cold / snowy Waterproof boots or snow boots  Holds warmth better Hot / humid Non-waterproof trail shoes More breathable; dry fast if they get wet Frequent water crossings Non-waterproof trail shoes Drain and dry quickly instead of trapping water inside How Quickly Do You Need Your Footwear to Dry? Have you ever accidentally stepped into a stream or puddle in your non-waterproof shoes? Your feet get wet immediately. Non-waterproof shoes get wet almost immediately, but they also dry fast if the weather is hot, which makes them ideal for summer hikes and repeated water crossings. Waterproof footwear stays dry initially, but if water seeps over the collar into the waterproof membrane, that same membrane that kept water out now keeps it in, and it will take longer to dry. Waterproof Boot or Waterproof Shoe? Watch the Tongue For waterproof styles, the gusseted tongue is the waterline. A gusseted tongue is sewn to the sides of the shoe so water and debris can’t sneak in around it, which means the waterproof membrane only protects you up to that point.  On a low waterproof shoe like the Scrambler Trail Low WP (women's), that line sits lower; step into a creek deeper than the tongue and water pours in. A mid boot like the Scrambler Trail Mid WP (women’s) raises that line, keeping you dry through deeper creeks. Pick your height based on how deep the water typically is. One thing to note: a waterproof membrane traps more heat and breathes less than open mesh. In hot weather, that can mean warmer, sweatier feet, another reason breathable shoes win in summer. If you’re hiking in hot conditions or have only a few potential wet spots, breathable non-waterproof materials allow heat and airflow to help dry the shoe as you move. Michael’s rule of thumb:  If there’s a chance your feet will get wet on a cold day, waterproof is the safer choice. Cold, wet feet can make any hike less enjoyable. Distance Short day hikes (under 5–7 miles): Hiking shoes are often lighter and more comfortable. Long distances or multi-day hikes: Boots offer more coverage and durability for sustained mileage, though many minimalist hikers happily go long in a trail shoe once their feet are conditioned. Does Pack Weight Matter? It does. The more weight you carry, the more your feet appreciate coverage and containment underfoot.  Pack Weight Recommended Footwear Why Light (under 20 lbs) Hiking shoes Plenty of protection; the least weight means the most agility Mid-weight (20–35 lbs) Hiking shoes or a mid-cut boot Extra coverage and ankle containment help as the load shifts Heavy (over 35 lbs) Supportive mid or high boot More coverage, ankle containment, and underfoot protection for the long haul     And don’t forget the weight on your feet. Every ounce you lift with each step adds up over thousands of steps, so wearing a lighter shoe can feel like fresher legs by the end of a long day. Does Your Foot Type Matter? It matters a lot, and it’s where barefoot-style footwear really shines. All of Xero Shoes’ boots and shoes have a wide, foot-shaped toe box, making them a comfortable choice for people with wider feet or bunions, because your toes get to spread out the way nature intended. Flat feet or high arches? Don’t let the “you need support” myth box you in. Here’s why barefoot shoes work for flat feet and high arches. Weak ankles, past injuries, or craving extra stability? A boot’s added coverage may feel reassuring on technical ground. Healthy ankles and a love of natural movement? A low-cut shoe lets your feet move freely. Whichever you choose, dial in the fit first. Our sizing guide takes the guesswork out. How Should Hiking Boots or Shoes Fit? Your hiking footwear should feel secure through the midfoot and heel, with enough room for your toes to move.  The goal is to get a fit that feels secure through the midfoot and heel while giving your toes room to spread. Your foot shouldn’t move around in your boots. Blisters can be a sign of pressure points or too-tight shoes. You can adjust the laces, starting at the bottom and working your way up to the ties to adjust fit. For hiking boots, the upper lacing hooks can also help dial in the fit around the collar and heel. Common Mistakes People Make When Choosing Hiking Footwear Sizing the toe box too small. Your toes should be able to splay, especially on long downhills. If you’ve ever shopped for footwear in-person, you may have been told to use your thumb to measure extra length in the toes. That added space is necessary for traditional footwear with narrow toe boxes because you’re adding room to keep your toes from getting squeezed. With Xero Shoes’ foot-shaped toe box, you may not need as much extra space in front. When in doubt, check the sizing guide. Buying for the hike you wish you did. Match your footwear to the trails you actually hike most, not a once-a-year trail adventure. Assuming waterproof is always better. In heat or minimal water crossings, breathable, fast-drying shoes usually win. Equating “support” with cushioning and stiffness. A rigid sole limits your foot’s ability to bend and flex. More cushioning does not automatically mean a better hike. Thick foam can create a disconnected feel. A lightweight, minimal cushioned shoe feels more connected to the trail, and you may find you’re adapting and moving more agile with that added proprioception.  Going heavier than you need. Think about wearing ankle weights. You’ll notice the weight the longer you wear them. Lighter footwear weighs less, so can feel better over the course of a hike, especially for fast hikers, day hikers, and anyone who prefers a more agile trail feel. Skipping the break-in and fit check. Some people can try on Xero Shoes and immediately hike their regular distances. If you’re new to zero-drop or barefoot shoes, we recommend testing the fit at home, and starting out on short walks before committing to big miles. Find Your Perfect Trail Pair Still deciding? Let your trails, and your feet, lead the way. Take our shoe finder quiz to get matched in minutes, or browse the full hiking boots & shoes collection (men’s · women’s).  Frequently Asked Questions Are hiking boots or hiking shoes better? There’s no “better” style. Boots add ankle coverage, protection, and waterproofing for rugged, wet, or cold terrain and heavier packs. Shoes are lighter, more breathable, and more agile for maintained trails, hot weather, and faster hikes. The best choice depends on your terrain, weather, distance, pack weight, and foot preference. Can I use trail running shoes for hiking?  Yes. A rugged trail runner like the Scrambler Low EV handles day hikes and moderate trails beautifully, with less weight and better breathability than a boot. For wet weather, water crossings, or heavy multi-day loads, a boot may serve you better. Do I need waterproof hiking shoes?  Only sometimes. Waterproof footwear is great for wet weather, but it breathes less and dries slowly once water gets inside. For hot weather and frequent water crossings, non-waterproof shoes that drain and dry fast are usually the smarter pick. Are barefoot hiking boots good for hiking? Yes. Barefoot hiking boots add ankle coverage while keeping a wide toe box, a flexible sole, and a zero-drop platform, so your feet can move naturally and get stronger on the trail. What size hiking shoe should I get? Most people order their regular size, but a foot-shaped toe box should leave room for your toes to spread, especially on descents. Use the Xero Shoes sizing guide to confirm your fit. Are hiking boots or shoes better for flat feet?  Either can work. The bigger win for flat feet or high arches is footwear that lets your foot move and strengthen naturally, rather than locking it in rigid support. The content of this post is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions or concerns you may have about your health or a medical condition. 
Read More Hiking Boots vs. Hiking Shoes: How to Choose the Right Trail Footwear
Expert-Recommended Train to Court Workout: 3 Phases for Better Court Movement

Expert-Recommended Train to Court Workout: 3 Phases for Better Court Movement

Try this expert-recommended 3-phase workout for court sport athletes to build court awareness, lateral control, and quicker reactions, starting with your feet.
Read More Expert-Recommended Train to Court Workout: 3 Phases for Better Court Movement

latest News

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Barefoot Running - The Movie!

Our friends Michael Sandler and Jessica Lee have just released an incredibly ambitious project:Barefoot Running - The MovieShot in Hawaii, the footage is STUNNING (it'll make you want to run, run barefoot, run barefoot in Hawaii, or just move to Hawaii). I'm telling you, some of the shots in this movie make it feel like you ARE running around Hawaii, which as the Fall descends on Colorado, is quite a pleasant feeling.And it's practically everything Michael and Jessie know, and have been teaching, about barefoot running for the last 3+ years. I say "practically" because the section of footwear is notoriously lacking in a mention of us ;-) (or of huaraches, in general).I asked Michael about this. He said, "When we got to that section of the video, it was just me and the director and one camera... and we didn't have any of our sample footwear -- including Xero Shoes -- on the island. And we had just a few hours to get that section done!"Apology accepted ;-)He did, though, let me know that huaraches are featured in their upcoming book, Barefoot Walking (due out early 2013).BTW, if you don't know, Michael and Jessie were my introduction to running without shoes... and Michael's comment that if I built a website for what was at the time a sandal-making hobby he would include us in his upcoming book... well, that was the beginning of Xero Shoes.Congrats on an impressive and heartfelt project, M & J... and thanks for inspiring what has become the most satisfying business I can imagine.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

"Barefoot Sandal" Start-up Hires Former Crocs Exec

“Barefoot Sandal” Start-up Xero Shoes Brings On Former Crocs Exec and Avia Co-founderBoulder, CO, October 2, 2012 – Dennis Driscoll, a 35-year footwear industry veteran who co-founded Avia Footwear and most recently worked as Global Design Director for Crocs, has joined Boulder-based barefoot running shoe start-up, Feel The World, Inc., the makers of Xero Shoes • Original Barefootware.Driscoll's roll at the bestselling "barefoot sandal" manufacturer is Chief Development Officer. Asked what attracted him to the product, he answers, "Xero Shoes are genuine, legitimate. We don't have to create ways to differentiate our product, because it is actually different."Regarding the company, and its co-founders, Steven Sashen and wife Lena Phoenix, Driscoll adds, "They are a smart team who've already proven themselves and their business. I like that my experience with all aspects of the footwear business can have a big impact here."Sashen and Phoenix reciprocate the admiration. "It’s highly unusual for someone of Dennis’s skills and caliber to work for a company at our stage. We're thrilled to have Dennis help take our product, and our company, to the levels we know they can attain."Dennis Driscoll started in the footwear business in 1978 with Osaga Athletic Footwear as the Director of Product Development. In 1981 he co-founded Avia Athletic Footwear as the VP of Product. Ten years later Dennis joined Wilson Sporting Goods as the Global Business Unit Director of Footwear. After a 7-year stint at Converse in senior product roles, Driscoll took a position at Doc Martens Footwear and moved to London as the Global Director of Product. In 2010, he went to work for Crocs as Global Design Director where he had a fourteen member design team in the US office and design centers in Padova, Italy and Tokyo, JapanABOUT:Feel The World, Inc. of Boulder, CO, manufactures Xero Shoes®,  a high-tech upgrade on the traditional huaraches running sandal of the Tarahumara Indians of Mexico. Durable, stylish and affordable — Xero Shoes supply the fun and benefits of being barefoot, but with a layer of protection.  Feel The World, Inc. launched in December 2009. To date, over 25,000 customers, ages 1 to 91, in more than 73 countries wear Xero Shoes for walking, hiking, yoga and gym-going, Crossfit, kayaking, jogging, and even running hundred-mile ultra marathons.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Xero Shoes Barefoot Sandals in COLOR!

Houston, we have color! I am extremely happy and proud to announce that you can now get Xero Shoes in 4 WAY COOL colors. And to celebrate, you can also save 20% if you order by October 2nd! In addition to our Coal Black, you can now get Mocha Earth, Electric Mint, Boulder Sky, and Hot Salmon. Combine those with our different lace colors... Well, here are a few combinations that you'll see around our office: Lena in her Mocha Earth with matching brown laces and a bunch of Brass Beads. Our office ultra-runner (and customer service manager), Bill, in Electric Mint with Purple laces (he puts 80-100 miles a week on these!) Steven, taking inspiration from an 8 year old customer who was the first one to wear non-matching laces, in Boulder Sky with White laces and a Hand Pendant (on the left) and Hot Salmon with Red laces (right). These new colors come in both Connect 4mm and Contact 6mm styles. And you can get them as kits or custom-made. Click here to order your Xero Shoes Colored Barefoot Sandals

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Dan Lieberman on Running Form

Harvard's Daniel Lieberman is one of the stars in Chris McDougall's book, Born To Run. In the book, Chris describes Dr. Lieberman's anthropological theory that humans ability to run long distances (while maintaining their body temperature) allowed us to chase down animals that, for short distances, are much faster than we are. He also details Lieberman's research into running mechanics and running form, including the famous study that demonstrated how barefoot running puts less force through your joints and can be better/safer for you.Well, thanks to Pete Larson at www.runblogger.com (who turned me onto the following video), and thanks to Tuck at http://yelling-stop.blogspot.com/ (from whom Pete found it), I'm happy to share this video of Dan sharing his top 5 tips for better running.All I would add (and I'm about to release something that describes this) is that "Don't overdo it" isn't a useful message, because the only way you know if you've over-done it, is when you've done too much and it's over! ;-)In other words, better to come up with a plan for what you ARE going to do, rather than make an admonition about what you shouldn't do, since us humans are as bad at following "don't do this" rules as we may be as good at chasing down an antelope.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

See, Barefoot Running is NOT Bad for You

The media is an interesting thing. One day, they love you, the next day they hate you. As long as there's controversy, they're interested... ish. The last time barefoot running made all the news it was when the University of Colorado study (done right up the hill from me) apparently showed that barefoot running was less efficient than running in shoes (see my analysis of that study here). In fact, when that study got published, the media went crazy, practically insisting that this was the death knell for those of us who run unshod. So, I'm not sure what it means that they've basically ignored a new study from Northumbria University that shows the exact opposite! Why are there no crazed headlines about how running without shoes really IS the greatest thing since bread, the slicer, and the sliced bread that comes from intelligently combining the two? Who knows. Who cares. More importantly, check out the info about the study here at ScienceDaily.com In short, if you want the synopsis: Runners used 6% more energy when they wore shoes. Here's the line I like: The results suggest that, by ditching their trainers, athletes new to barefoot running adopt a running style similar to experienced barefoot runners and enjoy an immediate and likely beneficial increase in running economy. Works for me (in fact it DID work for me!)

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Vibrating insoles, bare feet, and balance

The Wall Street Journal online published an article describing the research of James Collins from Harvard. James wondered why people get less steady on their feet as they get older.His conclusion: They get less feedback from the ground and lose the ability to balance.So far so good.His solution: An insole that provides random vibration to stimulate the nerves in the feet.Can anyone here think of another way of doing the same thing, but without all the electronic bells and whistles? Anyone? Beuler? Beuler?If you said, "Take off your shoes!" you win any prize on the second row!If you said "Take off your shoes! And if you don't want to step on unpleasant things, wear Xero Shoes!" you get a prize from the TOP row! ;-)If you think about this, it sheds light on another bit of research on balance and the elderly: Studies have shown that Tai Chi can help elderly people regain their balance. But it's probably not the Tai Chi that's causing the effect (BTW, I have nothing against Tai Chi... I did it and taught it for years). It's the time spent barefoot, FEELING the ground.I hope that someone does a study with Xero Shoes and balance sometime. I'd place a bet on the outcome.The content of this post does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions or concerns you may have about your health or a medical condition.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Barefoot Running... The Movie!

I know many of you are eagerly waiting for the Born To Run movie (I am, too).Well, until that's out at your local gajillion-plex, check out this trailer of the new barefoot running movie by Michael Sandler and Jessie Lee, authors of Barefoot Running.I'm forever grateful to Michael and Jessie... when I decided to try running barefoot as a way to deal with my persistent running injuries, I was fortunate enough that they were teaching a workshop that very weekend, right in my backyard (metaphorically speaking... it was 3 miles away).Even more, after my first barefoot run, when I said to Michael, "Well, that was interesting, but I'm a sprinter, not a long, slow distance guy," he encouraged me to try it a few more times and, for some reason, I did.Then, Jessie, being a former sprinter herself, added a whole other level of fun when we would take off across some field, leaving the LSD runners in the dust ;-)Oh, and it was Michael saying, "If you had a website for these sandals you're making, I'd put you in our new book," that was the beginning of Xero Shoes!If you watch this trailer and don't want to book a ticket for the workshop where Michael and Jessie take you to all of these amazing locations, then there's something wrong with you (or you already live in Hawaii).I've seen clips from the entire movie and it's really something special. Enjoy.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

How to think like a shoe company

You know the saying "when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?Well, it's true for shoe companies, too. When all you have is padding and motion-control, everything looks like it pronates and lands too hard!Check out this video about the "secret" Adidas development center. Especially watch at the 2:10 mark where the "best people in the world" analyze Ben's sprinting gait and conclude:a) That he pronates and heel-strikes (NOTE: He over pronates BECAUSE he heel-strikes since, when you land on your heel, the ankle muscles can't can hold the foot/ankle/lower leg in place).b) The solution: Making a shoe with padding and motion control!Uh...First of all, if you heel strike when you sprint, you are not sprinting! Sprinters do not heel strike. And when you land on your forefoot or midfoot, the entire musculature of the lower leg, ankle, and foot, can be "pre-loaded" and engage when you land.The cure for Ben is to STOP HEEL STRIKING, not get a shoe that lets him continue to run incorrectly. Duh.My next comment falls into the "maybe it's just me" category: Notice how large, spacious and expensive this place is. Ben mentions that Adidas does over a BILLION euros in sales.Look, I'm the last guy to deny any company the right to make money, and I'd love to have a billion dollar company.But am I the only one who sees a direct connection between a massive, pricey research lab and shoes that cost $150-200, and "hi-tech" shirts that cost $100+. This is like a thought I had at the Outdoor Retailer trade show, where some of the bigger companies have booths that easily cost over $1,000,000, "Oh, now I know why they charge so much for their products! They need to support the booth."Honestly, I find it unlikely that the "amazing" research they're doing actually pays for itself. I think it makes them feel good about themselves, and makes naive reporters think, "Oh, wow, they're doing something really special here."I don't doubt for a second that they could drop the price of their shoes to something more reasonable, not waste money on "research" that's iffy at best, and still make the same profit.Again, maybe that's just me.The content of this post does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions or concerns you may have about your health or a medical condition.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Run in Peace, Micah True

There's no way to adequately thank one of the great inspirations in the running world, Micah True, also known as Caballo Blanco ("White Horse"), who was found dead just hours ago. Micah, arguably the "star" of Christopher McDougall's best seller, Born To Run, went out for a run on Tuesday and did not return. There's no news at this moment about a cause of death.As Micah would often say in signing off, "Run Free!"Run In Peace, Micah.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

University of Colorado Barefoot Running Study

 The media is having an anti-barefoot running field day thanks to a study published by some people right up the street from me at the University of Colorado (BTW, I've been living in Boulder for 19 years and nobody has been able to explain why they call the university CU instead of UC.).Each of the dozens of articles about the study has a distinct flavor of elementary school playground taunting, "Nah, nah, nah, nah, boo, boo… barefoot running isn't good for you!"I mean, check out some of the headlines: Debunking the Barefoot Running Myth - Sydney Morning Herald (barefoot running isn't like bigfoot!) Here's Proof Barefoot Isn't Better -- Running Times (Ha! So there!)It almost feels like the press is enjoying creating a backlash to all the "pro" barefoot articles of the last two years, even though in every barefoot article I've read the media insists on publishing "both sides of the story," and includes some doctor who's never run a meter in bare feet and wouldn't know decent barefoot running form if it ran him over, claiming that running without shoes will hurt you, bring shame on your family, and accelerate the coming apocalypse.So, let's take a deep belly breath or two and have a chat about the study. In fact, let's start by talking about studies, in general:Designing a biomechanics study is not easy. Aside from deciding exactly what you want to explore and the best design of the study itself (how you can test it), finding enough of the right kind of participants is often tricky, if not impossible.It's even more difficult to design a study that isn't artificial in some way. That is, it's showing effects in a lab that may not be relevant in the real world.And, even more, many studies, while interesting, may not be relevant to the broader population. (Whenever someone quotes a study, or even just the habits, of elite marathoners, I respond "Unless you're 5'5" and weigh 105 pounds and run at 13 miles per hour for two hours... WHO CARES what those guys do?)Finally, the way the media picks up a study -- this one or any of the previous barefoot studies -- often adds some spin that isn't in the actual study.All of the issues I just raised are relevant as we take a gander at the CU study. BTW, if you want to see a lively and cogent critical look at the study, you can't go wrong with reading the comments on the New York Times article about it. Frankly, this post probably won't be as lucid as some of the comments there.Okay, let's jump into it… The gist of the study:"In the study, 12 subjects with substantial barefoot running experience ran at 7.5 MPH with a mid-foot strike pattern on a motorized treadmill, both barefoot and in lightweight cushioned shoes (~150 g/shoe, 5.4 oz). In additional trials, they attached small lead strips to each foot/shoe (~150, ~300, ~450 g). For each condition, they measured the subjects’ rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production as an index of metabolic cost.”And the results:a) For every 100g (3.5oz) (the average weight of a deck of playing cards) added per foot, energy cost increases by approximately 1% whether running barefoot or shod.b) Running barefoot and in lightweight shoes do not significantly differ in energy cost.c) When controlling for shoe/foot mass, running in lightweight shoes requires ~3-4% less energy than running barefoot."Now, let the fun begin. Can you find the "confounds" (the factors in the study that might affect the results, or the interpretation of the results)?I'll start. Let me know if you find more.1) How did they determine that the 12 subjects had "substantial barefoot experience?" Well, the study says, “8 km/week barefoot or in minimal running footwear (e.g. Vibram Five Fingers) for at least 3 months out of the last year.”Does 3 months out of the last 12 really equal "substantial?" I've been barefoot for 3 years, and I'm STILL improving my form.And if that three months was wearing VFFs or minimalist shoes, that counts as "barefoot experience" Uh…As I've commented, and as the American Council on Exercise showed, and as Pete Larsen from www.runblogger.com captured on video: VFFs are not the same as barefoot.Now the researchers did verify that the subjects all ran with a "midfoot or forefoot" landing. I know that Lee Saxby, the spokesman and coach from Vivobarefoot would have an issue with that. He doesn't think midfoot is proper barefoot form (there's some debate about that, but it's besides the point at the moment).2) They ran on a treadmill. Look, I get that testing runners on an actual track is hard and expensive, but running on a treadmill is not the same as running on the ground, end of story. It may give some useful data, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, but the duck is on a treadmill… hmmm, that analogy isn't quite working, but you know what I mean.I did some high-speed video analysis of my running at the Monfort Human Performance Lab. I hit 21 mph on that treadmill. I can tell you that when I'm on a treadmill, my stride is different than on the track. I overstride so I can "catch" the treadmill belt, for example.3) To simulate a running shoe's weight, the researchers put lead weights on the top surface of the runners' feet. Do you think some small weights pressing down on your foot is different than having that same amount of weight distributed evenly, and mostly under your foot, thanks to the design of the shoe? I do. Does that matter? Could be. Is there a way to check… not easily.4) The runners were at 7.5 miles per hour. That's slow for an elite runner --  about 200 meters in a minute, a quarter mile in 2 minutes, a mile in 8 minutes -- but fast for most casual runners. This raises a few questions:a) How was that pace compared to the runners' usual training pace? b) Does speed make a difference? c) What about turnover, or cadence? Were those controlled and the same when the runners were barefoot vs. shod?Got me. But, suffice it to say, we're seeing the artificial quality of the study.5) Oh, this wasn't mentioned above, but I'll give it to you now: the runners were wearing yoga socks. "“For the duration of the experiment, subjects wore very thin, slip-resistant yoga socks for safety and hygienic purposes.”Hygienic purposes? Uh, some 409 and a paper towel would handle any "hygiene issues." And "safety"? If you read the study, one aspect of "safety" is "avoiding blisters."Boy, where to start on that one? We know that socks does not equal barefoot, and we also know that if you get blisters when you run barefoot, you're doing something wrong. So, this brings us back to number 1 -- how experienced were these runners really?6) The study measured oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Okay, that's a fine way to measure efficiency, based on the idea that using less oxygen and producing less CO2 means you're using less effort, and that equals being more efficient.But here's a question: So what?For one: does using less energy equate to faster times? It seems like it might, but that's not a given.Does the amount of extra energy being used by *some* of the barefoot runners have any relevance to the average runner? Someone for whom 7.5 mph is too fast… or even too slow?7) Oh, here's a favorite. The runners in the study wore an ultra-lighweight racing flat. Most runners wouldn't wear those. And most runners with no barefoot experience wouldn't find those any friendlier than being shoe-free.8) One other thing: A hallmark of the scientific method is reproducibility. Just because one lab gets a result, that doesn't mean the question is resolved. When a study is reproduced in independent labs and the same (or very similar) result is obtained... then you know you've got something.What if the study is correct, though? What if barefoot running is less efficient than shod running?The only answer I can come up with is: Who cares?I don't mean that it's not important to know. I mean, literally, who should care?If you never race, you'll never notice any difference in efficiency (assuming, again that "decreased efficiency" = slower times).Besides, there are MANY other reasons to run with bare feet than the idea that it's more efficient... many that have barely been touched on (Dr. Michael Merzenich and I have had some interesting chats about how being barefoot could help the elderly in various ways). Personally, I didn't make the switch for efficiency's sake. In fact,  for me, as a sprinter, I know I'm more effective in spikes than barefoot. I switched because it helped me correct some form problems, eliminated injuries I was getting, turned running from a chore into an enthralling discovery, and, more importantly... WAS FUN.Don't get me wrong, I'm thrilled that my Boulder neighbors are researching barefoot running. And while this is the first published study, I know they have more coming and I'm looking forward to those.And I'm certainly not blaming them for how the media is handling the story.My only interest is the continued exploration, conversation, and understanding of efficient movement, running for speed and/or distance, and the ways of teaching and exploring barefoot running (and walking and hiking).No one study can perfectly address all of the open questions. But the almost combative attitude where everyone wants to jump on some one-sided "We're better!" bandwagon certainly doesn't help.Suffice it to say, this study is not the death knell of barefoot running that many media outlets are portraying it to be (because, you know, controversy is more important than truth if you're trying to sell papers).Now, if you'll pardon me, I have to burn off some of my frustration by putting on some yoga socks and minimalist shoes and going for a barefoot run.p.s. (added on 4/4/2012):I just realized that the conclusion of the study was WAY off base!Here's whyThe researchers think that the improved efficiency of the shoes came from the PADDING absorbing some of the stress that the muscles have to handle when you're barefoot.In other words, the ENTIRE efficiency effect could be ALL about the padding and have nothing to do with weight. The weight issue would only be valid if they tested multiple shoes of the same weight with different types of padded outsoles and got the same results.The content of this post does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions or concerns you may have about your health or a medical condition.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Dr. Mark's brilliant Natural Running video

Dr. Mark Cucuzzella is not only FAST (he won the US Air Force Marathon this year), he's committed to understanding the facts of barefoot running (and minimalist, too).As a physician, professor, and owner of Two Rivers Treads running shoe store, Mark is all about getting people running safely, enjoyably, and easily. Plus, he's a really nice guy.Mark just released an incredible video about "Natural Running." His emphasis in the video is about running barefoot, but his point is that if you run with a natural gait, you may be fine in a minimialist running shoe, too.Check out this video and let me know what you think.One of my favorite parts is simply seeing mark run... FAST. There are so many critics who say "You never see barefoot runners who have any speed" (forgetting, of course, Abebe Bikila, Zola Budd, Ron Hill, and many other fast, barefoot Olympians).I also like how Mark doesn't emphasize exactly how your foot is supposed to hit the ground other than "don't heel strike." A number of us, including Mark and Pete Larson (of www.runblogger.com) have been saying, "There will be individual differences in how you land on your foot -- from flat-footed, to fore-foot -- that will depend on your physiology and biomechanics as well as how fast you're running and whether you're running uphill, downhill, and even on the surface."That said, most new runners may want to focus on a forefoot strike at first, if for no other reason than many of us have lost our proprioceptive skills from years of wearing shoes and may think we're mid- or fore-foot landing when we're still heel striking. I've had more than my share of runners try to convince me that their heels never touched the ground, even when looking at video showing them clearly heel striking.Thanks to Mark for this great addition to the world of barefoot and natural running.The content of this post does not constitute and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified health provider with any questions or concerns you may have about your health or a medical condition.

Placeholder Image - Xero Shoes

Barefoot in Asia - Regev's Review

I just realized that I have a strange history with barefoot running, barefoot walking, and minimalist shoes.First, like most of us, I spent a lot of time barefoot as a kid in the Summer. I went to a camp in the Pocono Mountains (Camp Shohola just in case any readers also went there) and whenever I had the chance, I was barefoot (made easier by the fact that I spent half of my days doing water sports). I was a competitive diver, too, so that kept me out of shoes.In junior high school and high school, I was a gymnast, so that was even more barefoot time every day.When I was 18, I went to New York City to be a street performer. I had already been doing this in Washington, DC, doing a magic act in Georgetown, and on K Street, near the White House. When I got to NYC, though, I found it much harder to get a crowd and, even worse, within a few weeks, the other street magicians had stolen all my bits! I asked one of the veteran street acts what I should do and  he said, "Simple, write an act that nobody would dare steal."I pondered this for a while, until I landed on the answer. I created an act that had a bunch of crazy gymnastics in it (I did a running front flip over someone's head, stealing their hat and placing it on my head while in mid-flip), and a finale where I... wait for it... walked on broken glass in my bare feet.Now let me back up. For the gymnastics part of the act, I wore minimalist shoes. They were some old Adidas (I can't remember the name), with zero-drop, very little toe spring, not much padding. Just enough between me and the ground so I didn't kill my feet. This was in 1980-81, BTW.I loved these shoes. I bought every pair I could find. When I could no longer find them, I asked the local running shoe store what happened and he answered, "Adidas stopped selling them; they were lasting too long."I don't know if his info was accurate but, if it was, it wouldn't be the first time a company pulled a product that didn't wear out or go obsolete fast enough.Luckily, I found a company that sold shoes to prisons (you can find ANYTHING in NYC), and they had the last few pairs of these shoes... I bought them all. And they lasted through some serious abuse.Okay, back to walking barefoot on glass, though. Let's just say that it's part physics, part showmanship, and part some-hard-to-describe-thing that, if I could convince you to jump onto a 3" high pile of shattered beer bottles, you would instantly get a knowing look in your eye and say, "Ahhh... I get it now."In 5 years and thousands of shows, I only got one small cut. But by the end of the day, my feet were FILTHY from being barefoot on the street.CUT TO: Going to Asia in 1989.This is where I got hooked on being barefoot. Aside from the fact that you never wear shoes into almost any building (I was in China, Nepal, India and Thailand), there were plenty of opportunities to be barefoot outside as well. There were also plenty of times where you wanted something on your feet, but not much because it was really hot when I was there, and anything more than a sandal was way too much.When I came back from Asia, I stuck with the habit of removing my shoes whenever I went into someone's home (we've saved a fortune on carpet cleaning by not dragging dirt in from the outside).Okay, so why this long story?Simple, I was reminded of it all when Regev Elya did his review of Xero Shoes, which he took on a 7-month trip through Southeast Asia (I'm SO jealous).Of course, I think that Xero Shoes are the best minimalist shoes for a trip like that... but check out what Regev says.